@karasusyf 一边下雪一边开樱花好妙啊
@SodaWaitress 啊对,少说也十年了
现在基本上是午睡必梦魇(之前没睡好才需要午睡,午睡在白天,完美符合条件),只要不午睡就不会梦魇
@universesaidimthebestthing 是这样吗
@zimmer 你这阳台像个树林子
@turquoise 改改再投别的期刊
@mengminghan 我也觉得一种比较典型的状况就是妈妈在家家务全包,爸爸负责以一种智慧的形象示人
@echoco 给个简略的答案也不错啦,书里讲的情况是比如孩子问“月亮为什么是圆的”,家长答“不然是方的吗?”之前听过类似的回答是“如果是方的你又要问为什么是方的了”这种类型的,我觉得这种就比较讨厌。
也有孩子是打破砂锅问到底类型的吧
那种很考验家长的耐心和知识储备
Bright, curious children are a national and world resource. They need to be cared for, cherished, and encouraged. But mere encouragement isn’t enough. We must also give them the essential tools to think with.
@echoco 我好像吃不出来
Every now and then, I’m lucky enough to teach a kindergarten or first-grade class. Many of these children are natural-born scientists - although heavy on the wonder side and light on scepticism. They’re curious, intellectually vigorous. Provocative and insightful questions bubble out of them. They exhibit enormous enthusiasm. I’m asked follow-up questions. They’ve never heard of the notion of a ‘dumb question’.
But when I talk to high school seniors, I find something different. They memorize ‘facts’. By and large, though, the joy of discovery, the life behind those facts, has gone out of them. They’ve lost much of the wonder, and gained very little scepticism. They’re worried about asking ‘dumb’ questions; they’re willing to accept inadequate answers; they don’t pose follow-up questions; the room is awash with sidelong glances to judge, second-by-second, the approval of their peers. They come to class with their questions written out on pieces of paper, which they surreptitiously examine, waiting their turn and oblivious of whatever discussion their peers are at this moment engaged in.