@yan132 对面是谁?basically 不是一定的意思吧?如果你有特殊情况可以跟那边说说看,带上你导师的信之类的…我们学校规定博士入学后至少半年才能交论文,但因为我情况特殊,入学后一个月不到就交上去了
@QuantumBubbleTea 你还是去了!
@QuantumBubbleTea 我也想不到啊!一般有人让我看东西的时候我内心都是“何必呢你不说我也会帮忙看着的啊”
可能那些人也有和你类似的经历
@QuantumBubbleTea 也太糟心了
还是应该找旁边人看一下
High taxes will inevitably drive people to hide their work and profits. This makes monitoring their income difficult. Furthermore, the large bureaucracy required to run a comprehensive tax system […] can be prohibitively expensive. […] To avoid becoming a slave of their own tax collectors, autocrats often use indirect taxation instead. With indirect taxes, the cost of the tax is passed on to someone other than the person actually paying it. For instance, sellers pay sales taxes to municipal governments but sellers pass the cost on to buyers, making sales taxes indirect.
@ak_Consfanze_aK 一定是手机生产商的问题!
@Cronopio 那这样“在纽约地铁上”这个限定从头到尾就是多余的,总感觉偏离了作者的本意…可能这一段是他坐地铁的时候想出来的
@ak_Consfanze_aK 又是鸭舌
@[email protected] 哈哈,我没有料酒了
我用了梅酒,拭目以待!
@[email protected] 我东西都卤上了
还是觉得好怪啊,他说做估计的时候要结合人口基数和特征描述(是否符合刻板印象),问题是刻板印象完全是一个 heuristic,不存在“人群中 50% 的人符合这个刻板印象”这样的 knowledge,所以到底能怎么结合?而且结合了之后完全有可能结果还是更偏向于刻板印象指示的,为什么要说做出这样的选择是错误的?除非刻板印象完全不靠谱,但作者并不是这个观点..
@wwwwi11 这就是我后一段表达的啊,如果他是那个意思的话他就应该直接去掉 ride in New York subways,不然我觉得表意不清…
you see a person reading The New York Times on the New York subway. Which of the following is a better bet about the reading stranger?
She has a PhD.
She does not have a college degree.
Representativeness would tell you to bet on the PhD, but this is not necessarily wise. You should seriously consider the second alternative, because many more nongraduates than PhDs ride in New York subways.
这书里面好多逻辑都好怪啊,比如他凭什么认为 PhD 会更少地坐地铁?他要是说没有大学文凭的人比 PhD 多那含义还明确一点,虽然如果没有大学文凭的人比 PhD 多的话那在地铁里的比例估计也如此,但他加上“坐地铁”的话就让我搞不清楚他到底是哪个意思…
If you examine Tom W again, you will see that he is a good fit to stereotypes of some small groups of students (computer scientists, …
这本书是不是过时了,CS 现在是大热门诶!不过我很好奇基数大了之后的现在计算机专业的学生在大家眼里还有没有 nerdy 的那种刻板印象…